* implement most of the chain functions
* implement fork
* fix outpoint handling in Chain struct
* update expect for work
* split utxo into two sets
* update the Chain definition
* remove allow attribute in zebra-state/lib.rs
* merge ChainSet type into MemoryState
* Add error messages to asserts
* export proptest impls for use in downstream crates
* add testjob for disabled feature in zebra-chain
* try to fix github actions syntax
* add module doc comment
* update RFC for utxos
* add missing header
* working proptest for Chain
* propagate back results over channel
* Start updating RFC to match changes
* implement queued block pruning
* and now it syncs wooo!
* remove empty modules
* setup config for proptests
* re-enable missing_docs lint
* update RFC to match changes in impl
* add documentation
* use more explicit variable names
* Begin work on RFC5 implementation
* I think this is necessary
* holy shit supertrait implemented via subtrait
* implement most of the chain functions
* change to slightly better name
* implement fork
* fix outpoint handling in Chain struct
* update expect for work
* resolve review comment
* split utxo into two sets
* update the Chain definition
* just a little more
* update comment
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* apply changes from code review
* remove allow attribute in zebra-state/lib.rs
* Update zebra-state/src/memory_state.rs
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* merge ChainSet type into MemoryState
* rename state impl types
* Add error messages to asserts
* checkpoint so I can split off arbitrary changes into a PR
* export proptest impls for use in downstream crates
* add testjob for disabled feature in zebra-chain
* run rustfmt
* try to fix github actions syntax
* differentiate name
* prove that github action tests zebra-chain build without features
* revert change from last commit now that test is running
* remove accidentally introduced newline
* checkpoint
* add module doc comment
* update RFC for utxos
* add missing header
* working proptest for Chain
* apply change from chain impl PR
* setup config for proptests
* Update zebra-chain/src/block/arbitrary.rs
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* run rustfmt
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* export proptest impls for use in downstream crates
* add testjob for disabled feature in zebra-chain
* run rustfmt
* try to fix github actions syntax
* differentiate name
* prove that github action tests zebra-chain build without features
* revert change from last commit now that test is running
* remove accidentally introduced newline
* Update .github/workflows/ci.yml
Co-authored-by: Deirdre Connolly <deirdre@zfnd.org>
Co-authored-by: Deirdre Connolly <deirdre@zfnd.org>
This addresses at least three pain points:
- we were affected by bugs that were already fixed in git, but not in
the released crate;
- we can use service combinators to transform requests and responses;
- we can use the hedge middleware.
The version in git is still marked as 0.3.1 but these changes will be
part of tower 0.4: https://github.com/tower-rs/tower/issues/431
* add zebrad acceptance tests
* add custom command test helpers that work with kill
* add and use info event for start and seed commands
* combine conflicting tests into one test case
Co-authored-by: Jane Lusby <jane@zfnd.org>
We had a brief discussion on discord and it seemed like we had consensus on the
following versioning policy:
* zebrad: match major version to NU version, so we will start by releasing
zebrad 3.0.0;
* zebra-* libraries: start by matching zebrad's version, then increment major
versions of each library as we need to make breaking changes (potentially
faster than the zebrad version, always respecting semver but making no
guarantees about the longevity of major releases).
This commit sets all of the crate versions to 3.0.0-alpha.0 -- the -alpha.0
marks it as a prerelease not subject to perfect adherence to compatibility
guarantees.
* rename zebra-storage to zebra-state
* Setup initial skeleton for zebra-state
* add test
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Henry de Valence <hdevalence@hdevalence.ca>
* move shared test vectors to a common crate
Co-authored-by: Jane Lusby <jane@zfnd.org>
Co-authored-by: Henry de Valence <hdevalence@hdevalence.ca>