* propose a v5 transaction rfc
* define orchard flags
* Update test sections
* Add security section
* move some code into sapling and orchard crates, do renames
* Move sapling value balance into shielded data
* Add AuthorizedAction type
* Order fields based on last serialized data
* Add the proofsOrchard field
* Delete visibility modifiers for readability
All those `pub`s make the design harder to read.
* Model anchor variants as generic trait types
* Be specific about the network upgrade
* Specify a file for each new type
* Document how the Orchard flags are used
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* create readme for utils and checkpoints
* add link to checkpoint usage to book
Co-authored-by: Deirdre Connolly <durumcrustulum@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* WIP: First draft of release criteria for review
* Update release-criteria.md
Fix formatting
* Added more details to release criteria
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* Add "Future Releases" section
* Remove Alpha Release criteria items
These should be included and expanded upon in future releases
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* Formatting fixes
* Remove support and troubleshooting criteria from first alpha release
* Switching functionality criteria between future and alpha release
* Remove redundant statement from "Network Readiness" section for "Future Releases"
* Go/No-Go checklist should be a living document
Let's make this a living document by making it clear that this reflects the latest status as of the "Last updated" date
* Update release-criteria.md
Update status after Go/No-Go meeting
* Make RAG status symbols more accessible
* Update release-criteria.md
- Remove "Future Releases" section
- Clean up formatting
* Update book/src/dev/release-criteria.md
change "`zebrad` can validate proof of work" from green to amber
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* Update book/src/dev/release-criteria.md
Change "Build completes within 30 minutes in Zebra's CI" from green to amber
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* Update book/src/dev/release-criteria.md
Change "known panics, errors and warnings have open tickets" and "`zebrad` executes normally" form amber to green
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* Rename release-criteria.md to alpha-release-criteria.md
We will have new release criteria for future releases
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* Difficulty Contextual RFC: Introduction
Add a header, summary, and motivation
* Difficulty RFC: Add draft definitions
And update the state RFC definitions to match.
* Difficulty RFC: Add relevant chain
* Difficulty RFC: draft guide-level explanation
Outline the core calculations and checks.
* Difficulty RFC: Revised based on spec fixes
Update the design based on the spec bugs in #1276, #1277, and
zcash/zips#416.
These changes make the difficulty filter into a context-free check,
so we remove it from this contextual validation RFC.
* Difficulty RFC: Explain how Zebra's calculations can match the spec
* Difficulty RFC: write most of the reference section
Includes most of the implementation, modules for each function, and
draft notes for some of the remaining parts of the RFC.
* Difficulty RFC: Add an AdjustedDifficulty struct
* Difficulty RFC: Summarise module structure in the one place
* Difficulty RFC: Create implementation notes subsections
* Difficulty RFC: add consensus critical order of operations
* Difficulty RFC: Use the ValidateContextError type
* Difficulty RFC: make the median_time arg mut owned
We have to clone the data to pass a fixed-length array to a function,
so we might as well sort that array to find the median, and avoid a
copy.
## Motivation
Prior to this PR we've been using `sled` as our database for storing persistent chain data on the disk between boots. We picked sled over rocksdb to minimize our c++ dependencies despite it being a less mature codebase. The theory was if it worked well enough we'd prefer to have a pure rust codebase, but if we ever ran into problems we knew we could easily swap it out with rocksdb.
Well, we ran into problems. Sled's memory usage was particularly high, and it seemed to be leaking memory. On top of all that, the performance for writes was pretty poor, causing us to become bottle-necked on sled instead of the network.
## Solution
This PR replaces `sled` with `rocksdb`. We've seen a 10x improvement in memory usage out of the box, no more leaking, and much better write performance. With this change writing chain data to disk is no longer a limiting factor in how quickly we can sync the chain.
The code in this pull request has:
- [x] Documentation Comments
- [x] Unit Tests and Property Tests
## Review
@hdevalence
Prior to this PR we realized that the RFC had been drafted with the assumption that chains would be ordered from best to worst in `NonFinalizedState`. This assumption was incorrect, since `BTreeSet` only ever orders values in ascending order. This discrepancy was noticed and fixed in the code, but there were still some inconsistencies that needed to be cleaned up.
This PR updates all the incorrect or confusing comments about chain ordering in the RFC and code.
The difficulty validation RFC will introduce a definition of
per-block difficulty. Make it clear that the state RFC
definition is cumulative difficulty.
## Motivation
The zebra-state service needs to be able to handle duplicate blocks.
## Solution
This implements changes already outlined by [The State
RFC](https://zebra.zfnd.org/dev/rfcs/0005-state-updates.html). We check for
successfully committed blocks first, since interacting with the queued blocks
struct at this point just complicates the implimentation. If the block has not
already been committed we then check if the block has already been queued, if
not we handle the block normally (normally here being the bit we already had
implemented).
## Documentation Changes
- [x] Update the state RFC to match the ways this fix departs from the design
- the main thing is that I switched the order of checking for duplicates
- [x] ~~Add newly added functions to the state rfc~~ Decided not to do this because they're minor getters that don't influence the rest of the design and aren't exposed as part of the API
- [x] Document newly added functions inline
## Testing
## Related Issues
- fixes https://github.com/ZcashFoundation/zebra/issues/1182
- tracking issue https://github.com/ZcashFoundation/zebra/issues/1049
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
Binding grafana to localhost makes it inaccessible from the wider internet,
which is a secure default.
Since we run docker with host networking, docker containers have access to D-Bus and other
security-related services on localhost. So it's risky to also expose them to the wider internet.
* Reverse displayed endianness of transaction and block hashes
* fix zebra-checkpoints utility for new hash order
* Stop using "zebrad revhex" in zebrad-hash-lookup
* Rebuild checkpoint lists in new hash order
This change also adds additional checkpoints to the end of each list.
* Replace TransactionHash with transaction::Hash
This change should have been made in #905, but we missed Debug impls
and some docs.
Co-authored-by: Ramana Venkata <vramana@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
Alfredo Garcia
teor
Deirdre Connolly
Henry de Valence
Pili Guerra
Jane Lusby
Jane Lusby