* Make Amount arithmetic more generic
To modify generated amounts, we need some extra operations on `Amount`.
We also need to extend existing operations to both `NonNegative` and
`NegativeAllowed` amounts.
* Add a constrain method for ValueBalance
* Derive Eq for ValueBalance
* impl Neg for ValueBalance
* Make some Amount arithmetic expectations explicit
* Explain why we use i128 for multiplication
And expand the overflow error details.
* Expand Amount::sum error details
* Make amount::Error field order consistent
* Rename an amount::Error variant to Constraint, so it's clearer
* Add specific pool variants to ValueBalanceError
* Update coinbase remaining value consensus rule comment
This consensus rule was updated recently to include coinbase transactions,
but Zebra doesn't check block subsidy or miner fees yet.
* Add test methods for modifying transparent values and shielded value balances
* Temporarily set values and value balances to zero in proptests
In both generated chains and proptests that construct their own transactions.
Using zero values reduces value calculation and value check test coverage.
A future change will use non-zero values, and fix them so the check passes.
* Add extra fields to remaining transaction value errors
* Swap the transparent value balance sign to match shielded value balances
This makes the signs of all the chain value pools consistent.
* Use a NonNegative constraint for transparent values
This fix:
* makes the type signature match the consensus rules
* avoids having to write code to handle negative values
* Allocate total generated transaction input value to outputs
If there isn't enough input value for an output, set it to zero.
Temporarily reduce all generated values to avoid overflow.
(We'll remove this workaround when we calculate chain value balances.)
* Consistently use ValueBalanceError for ValueBalances
* Make the value balance signs match the spec
And rename and document methods so their signs are clearer.
* Convert amount::Errors to specific pool ValueBalanceErrors
* Move some error changes to the next PR
* Add extra info to remaining transaction value errors (#2585)
* Distinguish between overflow and negative remaining transaction value errors
And make some error types cloneable.
* Add methods for updating chain value pools (#2586)
* Move amount::test to amount::tests:vectors
* Make ValueBalance traits more consistent with Amount
- implement Add and Sub variants with Result and Assign
- derive Hash
* Clarify some comments and expects
* Create ValueBalance update methods for blocks and transactions
Co-authored-by: Alfredo Garcia <oxarbitrage@gmail.com>
* Add an OrderedUtxo type for validation of spends within a block
This change allows us to check that transparent spends use outputs from
earlier in their block. (But we don't actually do that check yet.)
We need to keep the order of UTXOs when we're contextually verifying
each new block that is added to a chain. But the block order is
irrelevant for UTXOs stored in the state.
* Take ownership in utxos_from_ordered_utxos
* Delete a confusing comment
* Always use librustzcash for sighash and remove old sighash code
Also added ZIP-143 test vectors
* Remove librustzcash_sighash test that is no longer needed
* Make `verify_sapling_shielded_data` more generic
Prepare to support V5 transactions which have a shared anchor.
* Verify Sapling shielded data in V5 transactions
Call the `verify_sapling_shielded_data` method and add the respective
asynchronous checks to the set of V5 checks.
* Fix expect message in V4 transaction test
It was using the same message as the previous test, even though the test
searches with different criteria.
* Test V5 transaction with Sapling spends
Create a fake V5 transaction that has Sapling spends and check that the
verifier accepts the transaction.
* Ignore rejected V5 transaction test for now
Because now it needs the `sighash` implementation for V5 to be ready.
* Reference V5 `sighash` PR in comment
So that it is easier to check if it's possible to remove the
`should_panic` or not.
Co-authored-by: Alfredo Garcia <oxarbitrage@gmail.com>
* Remove `sapling shielded pool` TODO
V5 transactions now have Sapling shielded pool properly validated.
* Link to some extra issues in TODO comment
Some other issues are also necessary for full V5 validation.
* Add a TODO in the main code to fix the tests
Some tests are blocked due to missing features required for full V5
validation. Once those features are implemented, they should be updated
to remove the `#[should_panic]` attribute so that they actually run and
check the code correctly.
Co-authored-by: Alfredo Garcia <oxarbitrage@gmail.com>
* add disabled sprout pool check
* change method name
* change error name
* fix typo
* make the success test case in other tx than the coinbase
* use new `height` method instead of deriving `PartialOrd` in `NetworkUpgrade`
* move check of network upgrade into function, rename, docs
* increase test coverage
* fix comment
* Refactor to create `verify_sapling_shielded_data`
Move the code to verify Sapling shielded data into a new helper method
that returns `AsyncChecks`.
* Test verifying a Sapling transaction with spends
Use the test vectors to find a transaction that has Sapling spends and
test if it the verifier considers it valid.
* Create a helper method to list test transactions
Transforms the block test vectors into a list of transactions and block
heights for each transaction.
* Use new helper function in V4 Sapling spend test
Also use the block height for that transaction as specified in the test
vector.
* Test V4 tx. with Sapling outputs but no spends
Find a transaction V4 vector that has Sapling outputs but no spends, and
check that the verifier accepts it.
* Add a `zebra_test::RUNTIME` shared runtime
Create a lazily instantiated Tokio runtime that can be shared by tests.
* Split tests that require a shared runtime
Split two tests that were previously in one because of the need to share
a single Tokio runtime. With the `zebra_test::RUNTIME`, they can now
share the runtime without having to be a single test.
* Stop trying to verify coinbase inputs using the script verifier
And create tests to catch similar bugs earier.
* Use Testnet in NU5 tests that temporarily should_panic
We've marked these tests as should_panic until there is a NU5 activation
height. But Testnet will have an activation height first, so we should
prefer it in the tests. (Or use both networks.)
* Refactor to create `verify_sprout_shielded_data`
Move the join split verification code into a new
`verify_sprout_shielded_data` helper method that returns an
`AsyncChecks` set.
* Test if signed V4 tx. join splits are accepted
Create a fake V4 transaction with a dummy join split, and sign it
appropriately. Check if the transaction verifier accepts the
transaction.
* Test if unsigned V4 tx. joinsplit data is rejected
Create a fake V4 transaction with a dummy join split. Do NOT sign this
transaction's join split data, and check that the verifier rejects the
transaction.
* Join tests to share Tokio runtime
Otherwise one of the tests might fail incorrectly because of a
limitation in the test environment. `Batch` services spawn a task in the
Tokio runtime, but separate tests can have separate runtimes, so sharing
a `Batch` service can lead to the worker task only being available for
one of the tests.
* Add missing documentation
Document methods to describe what they do and why.
* Create an `AsyncChecks` type alias
Make it simpler to write the `FuturesUnordered` type with boxed futures.
This will also end up being used more when refactoring to return the
checks so that the `call` method can wait on them.
* Create `verify_transparent_inputs_and_outputs`
Refactors the verification of the transparent inputs and outputs into a
separate method.
* Refactor transparent checks to use `call_all`
Instead of pushing the verifications into a stream of unordered futures,
use the `ServiceExt::call_all` method to build an equivalent stream
after building a stream of requests.
* Replace `CallAll` with `FuturesUnordered`
Make it more consistent with the rest of the code, and make sure that
the `len()` method is available to use for tracing.
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* Refactor to move wait for checks into a new method
Allow the code snipped to be reused by other transaction
version-specific check methods.
* Verify transparent inputs in V5 transactions
Use the script verifier to check the transparent inputs in a V5
transaction.
* Check `has_inputs_and_outputs` for all versions
Check if a transaction has inputs and outputs, independently of the
transaction version.
* Wait for checks in `call` method
Refactor to move the repeated code into the `call` method. Now the
validation methods return the set of asynchronous checks to wait for.
* Add helper function to mock transparent transfers
Creates a fake source UTXO, and then the input and output that represent
spending that UTXO. The initial UTXO can be configured to have a script
that either accepts or rejects any spend attempt.
* Test if transparent V4 transaction is accepted
Create a fake V4 transaction that includes a fake transparent transfer
of funds. The transfer uses a script to allow any UTXO to spend it.
* Test transaction V4 rejection based on script
Create a fake transparent transfer where the source UTXO has a script
that rejects spending. The script verifier should not accept this
transaction.
* Test if transparent V5 transaction is accepted
Create a mock V5 transaction that includes a transparent transfer of
funds. The transaction should be accepted by the verifier.
* Test transaction V5 rejection based on script
Create a fake transparent transfer where the source UTXO has a script
that rejects spending. The script verifier should not accept this
transaction.
* Update `Request::upgrade` getter documentation
Simplify it so that it won't become updated when #1683 is fixed.
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* Add a `Transaction::version` getter
Returns the version of the transaction as a `u32`.
* Add `Transaction::is_overwintered` helper method
Returns if the `fOverwintered` flag should be set for the transaction's
version.
* Use new helpers to serialize transaction version
Reduce the repeated code and make it less error-prone with future
changes.
* Add getter methods to `transaction::Request` type
Refactor to move the type deconstruction code into the `Request` type.
The main objective is to make it easier to split the call handler into
methods that receive the request directly.
* Refactor to create `verify_v4_transaction` helper
Split the code specific to V4 transactions into a separate helper
method.
* Create `verify_v5_transaction` helper method
Prepare a separate method to have the validation code.
* Add `UnsupportedByNetworkUpgrade` error variant
An error for when a transaction's version isn't supported by the network
upgrade of the block it's included or for the current network upgrade if
the transaction is for the mempool.
* Verify a V5 transaction's network upgrade
For now, only NU5 supports V5 transactions.
* Test that V5 transaction is rejected on Canopy
Create a fake V5 transaction and try to verify it using a block height
from Canopy's activation. The verifier should reject the transaction
with an error saying that the network upgrade does not support that
transaction version.
* Test if V5 tx. is accepted after NU5 activation
Create a fake V5 transaction and pretend it is placed in a block that
has a height after the NU5 activation. The test should succeed, but
since the NU5 activation height has not been specified yet (neither for
the testnet nor the mainnet), for now this test is marked as
`should_panic`.
* Add `TODO` comment to the code
Add more detail to what's left to do, and link to the appropriate PRs.
* Use `u32` to store transaction version
Use a type consistent with how the version is specified.
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* Add a `at_least_one!` macro for testing
Similar to the `vec!` macro, but doesn't allow creating an empty list.
* Test if `has_inputs_and_outputs` considers actions
Create a dummy transaction with no inputs and no outputs, and add a
dummy Orchard action to it. The `check::has_inputs_and_outputs`
should succeed, because the consensus rule considers having Orchard
actions as having inputs and/or outputs.
* Refactor to create helper function
Move the code to create a fake Orchard shielded data instance to a
helper function in `zebra_chain::transaction::arbitrary`, so that other
tests can also use it.
* Test coinbase V5 transaction with enable spends
A V5 coinbase transaction that has Orchard shielded data MUST NOT have
the enable spends flag set.
* Test if coinbase without enable spends is valid
A coinbase transaction with Orchard shielded data and without the enable
spends flag set should be valid.
* Add a security comment about the `at_least_one!` macro
This macro must not be used outside tests, because it allows memory denial
of service.
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* Implement `PartialEq<i64>` for `Amount`
Allows to compare an `Amount` instance directly to an integer.
* Add `SerializationError::BadTransactionBalance`
Error variant representing deserialization of a transaction that doesn't
conform to the Sapling consensus rule where the balance MUST be zero if
there aren't any shielded spends and outputs.
* Validate consensus rule when deserializing
Return an error if the deserialized V4 transaction has a non-zero value
balance but doesn't have any Sapling shielded spends nor outputs.
* Add consensus rule link to field documentation
Describe how the consensus rule is validated structurally by
`ShieldedData`.
* Clarify that `value_balance` is zero
Make the description more concise and objective.
Co-authored-by: Alfredo Garcia <oxarbitrage@gmail.com>
* Update field documentation
Include information about how the consensus rule is guaranteed during
serialization.
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* Remove `check::sapling_balances_match` function
The check is redundant because the respective consensus rule is
validated structurally by `ShieldedData`.
* Test deserialization of invalid V4 transaction
A transaction with no Sapling shielded spends and no outputs but with a
non-zero balance value should fail to deserialize.
* Change least-significant byte of the value balance
State how the byte index is calculated, and change the least
significant-byte to be non-zero.
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* Fix documentation comment
Was missing a slash to become documentation.
* Add documentation link to type reference
Just to help navigation a bit.
* Implement `Transaction::orchard_actions()` getter
Returns an iterator to iterator over the actions in the Orchard shielded
data (if there is one, otherwise it returns an empty iterator).
* Add V5 support for `has_inputs_and_outputs`
Checks if the transaction has Orchard actions. If it does, it is
considered to have inputs and outputs.
* Refactor transaction test vectors
Make it easier to reuse the fake V5 transaction converter in other test
vectors.
* Move helper function to `zebra-chain` crate
Place it together with some other helper functions, including the one
that actually creates the fake V5 transaction.
* Test transaction with no inputs
`check::has_inputs_and_outputs` should return an error indicating that
the transaction has no inputs.
* Test transaction with no outputs
`check::has_inputs_and_outputs` should return an error indicating that
the transaction has no outputs.
* Note that transaction is fake in `expect` message
Should make the message easier to find, and also gives emphasis to the
fact that the transaction is a fake conversion to V5.
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* validate sapling v5 tx
* Make itertools dependency optional
We only need itertools when the `proptest-impl` feature is enabled.
* Check if V4 and V5 coinbase transactions contain PrevOut transparent inputs
This is a bugfix on V4 transaction validation. The PrevOut consensus
rule was not explicitly stated in the Zcash spec until April 2021.
(But it was implied by Bitcoin, and partially implemented by Zebra.)
Also do the shielded sapling input check for V5 transactions.
* Add spec and orchard TODOs to has_inputs_and_outputs
Also make the variable names match the spec.
* Sort transaction functions to match v5 data order
* Simplify transaction input and output checks
Move counts or iterators into `Transaction` methods, so we can remove
duplicate code, and make the consensus rule logic clearer.
* Update sapling_balances_match for Transaction v5
- Quote from the spec
- Explain why the function is redunant for v5
- Rename the function so it's clear that it is sapling-specific
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
teor
Alfredo Garcia
Conrado Gouvea
Janito Vaqueiro Ferreira Filho