* Implement sighash
* move sighash logic to a separate module
* start filling in more of the alg
* start setting up a test case
* make the test useful
* Iter transaction inputs
* better error message for expect
* add support for zip243 sighash
* ohey first testvector is passing, yayyy
* pass the second testvector
* add last testvector
* move a use statement
* use common deserialization code for amount everywhere
* cleanup attributes
* bring in fixed preimage
* fix discrepancy with spec
* always deserialize as a signed value
* Update zebra-chain/src/transaction/sighash.rs
* update unreachable statements
* add serialization impls for nonnegative amounts
* Apply suggestions from code review
* document sighash fn
* tweek docs
* fix mistake in translation for zip243
* consistent error messages
* reorder because i like it more that way
* document more panics
* Update zebra-chain/src/amount.rs
* Add comment regarding the serialization of spend descriptions in sighash
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
Co-authored-by: Deirdre Connolly <deirdre@zfnd.org>
* attempt to use zcashconsensus crate in zebra-script
* boop
* update verify fn to use zebra types
* a bit more cleanup
* cleanup
* more
* beep boop
* fix renamed member
* cleaning
* get a real branch id
* remove as of yet unneeded api
* Update zebra-chain/src/transaction.rs
* Update zebra-chain/src/transaction.rs
* more cleanup
* oops wrong dep section
* use a tuple to communicate arg association
* update to use published version of zcash_script
* fix new compiler error
* install llvm on windows
* fix bindgen bug????
* try to get docker file to win
* okay try everything
* fix windows build maybe
* always download choco
* fix paths for moved types
* try a different error message
* try convenience script
* try installing just llvm
* add back one more
* try installing some headers
* try a diff package
* try everything
* remove the minimum
* try newer docker builder image
* cleanup docker image
* cleanup extra ci step
The ShieldedData container for the spend and output descriptions of a
transaction does *not* move, because it's encoding transaction
structure. A good sign that this is the right factoring is that the
transaction module now only needs to pull in sapling::{Spend, Output}
and not all the internals.
This is the first in a sequence of changes that change the block:: items
to not include Block as a prefix in their name, in accordance with the
Rust API guidelines.
This Merkle tree is the SHA256d one used only for including transactions
in a block, so it should be kept there in order to not be confused with
other Merkle trees (like the note commitment trees).