5dd945f2b7
add CreateScript Example
2014-03-29 22:38:08 -03:00
9fc2493a6d
remove .init(), move it to constructor
2014-03-29 04:01:32 -03:00
7504637d92
fix example.html (keymodule)
2014-03-28 23:54:59 -03:00
26b7f89f39
update examples and readme
2014-03-28 23:39:12 -03:00
cb1a2d9b48
TransactionBuiler working with test
2014-03-28 21:17:34 -03:00
4ceacec9e8
Merge pull request #196 from matiu/feature/remove-unused-code
...
remove blockchain* inputcache* related code
2014-03-27 11:59:43 -04:00
3d61a1480e
remove blockchain* inputcache* related code
2014-03-27 12:47:31 -03:00
9cc70a3b57
Merge pull request #190 from maraoz/test/sighash
...
Test sighash (Transaction.hashForSignature())
2014-03-26 16:25:46 -04:00
057b7c2a0d
added bitcointalk reference
2014-03-26 14:50:50 -03:00
18630bb2b1
fix browser tests
2014-03-26 12:00:03 -03:00
b020fe1e80
add sighash tests
2014-03-26 11:51:28 -03:00
72570719d8
random transaction and script generation
2014-03-25 14:37:23 -03:00
3ad329f032
Merge pull request #188 from ryanxcharles/bug/script-push-data
...
script parsing should be more loose on pushdata
2014-03-25 09:42:42 -04:00
4319a20676
add test of correct parsing of valid script
...
Even of OP_PUSHDATA1 says to push 117 bytes, if there are only 75 bytes
following, this should still be pushed to the stack.
2014-03-24 20:27:51 -04:00
f89dcda0a2
script parsing should be more loose on pushdata
...
This testnet transaction was being parsed incorrectly:
cc64de74ba7002bbf4e3646824d7bbf0920004fb2ce45aa7270c4116ff11b715
Script was throwing an error when it should not have been. The error was that
PUSHDATA1 was trying to push 117 bytes to the stack, but it was followed by
only 75 bytes. But this transaction is accepted as valid by bitcoin-qt on
testnet. So we are mistaken by throwing an error in this case.
2014-03-24 20:18:08 -04:00
085d5ad59b
Merge pull request #187 from mljsimone/master
...
Update README.md
2014-03-24 17:55:29 -04:00
b24b635778
Update README.md
2014-03-24 18:52:57 -03:00
fa47ee9984
Merge remote-tracking branch 'matiu/feature/Block-test'
...
Conflicts:
util/util.js
2014-03-21 14:57:45 -07:00
02296d9517
fix firefox compatibility issue with buffertools#compare
2014-03-21 18:52:49 -03:00
227a95296b
remove stracktrace for firefox error reporting
2014-03-21 18:00:13 -03:00
8ec4f2f9c5
add -target=dev option to grunt to prevent minifying the source
2014-03-21 17:58:59 -03:00
d9cbe13d93
Merge pull request #170 from MattFaus/fix_transaction_tests2
...
Hook up testdata/tx_valid.json and tx_invalid.json test cases
2014-03-21 12:55:41 -07:00
aad33d0c4a
remove test code
2014-03-21 16:47:45 -03:00
684be77268
small fixes in block, adapt to browser bignum. remove legacy code
2014-03-21 16:39:38 -03:00
5b95b0f0fd
Block.js tests WIP
2014-03-21 16:38:01 -03:00
1c1bb068b8
fix util problem
2014-03-21 12:13:24 -07:00
230420fb00
fix test code for Transaction. Test skipped because they still fail
2014-03-21 12:13:23 -07:00
ba92a6b1df
refactor and fixes for Transaction, ScriptInterpreter, and Key
2014-03-21 12:13:23 -07:00
b227341c12
some Transaction tests fixed (canonical signatures)
2014-03-21 12:13:23 -07:00
7869308784
remove console.log
2014-03-21 12:13:23 -07:00
7097ace9dc
Remove console.log() statements
2014-03-21 12:13:23 -07:00
5c65149b2e
Mark failing tests with skip()
2014-03-21 12:13:23 -07:00
07f49195ea
Update invalid transaction test case
2014-03-21 12:13:23 -07:00
8a8ae5b357
Fix merge problem
2014-03-21 12:13:23 -07:00
4ad36b4fb8
Refactor parsing test data into function, add iteration over invalid transaction tests
2014-03-21 12:13:23 -07:00
5af02e937a
Work in progress. I have a problem with the verifyInput() callback calling itself whenever the test assertions throw an exception. I looked at the step and async libraries that are already installed via package.json, but I don't think either of these provide the functionality I need.
2014-03-21 12:13:23 -07:00
7257526de3
Reverting modifications of testdata
2014-03-21 12:13:23 -07:00
a2a923fa99
Get Transaction test cases running
...
I removed the skip over the tx_valid.json file and made some tweaks to get most of the test cases passing. There are still two test cases that fail, as pointed out by the TODO comment I added above them. Oddly, running the test suite reports 3 failing test cases, but if I delete the two marked with the TODO there are 0 reported failures. So, there may be some kind of interaction with these test cases and the others. More investigation is needed.
I updated the two test cases that were testing transaction `23b397edccd3740a74adb603c9756370fafcde9bcc4483eb271ecad09a94dd63` with the input script I found on blockchain.info https://blockchain.info/tx/23b397edccd3740a74adb603c9756370fafcde9bcc4483eb271ecad09a94dd63 . A quick search found one other person who was using this same script (23b397edcc
2014-03-21 12:13:23 -07:00
b19efa5fb3
Merge pull request #176 from maraoz/feature/add-base58key-tests
...
add bitcoin core base58key tests
2014-03-20 08:57:26 -07:00
150a943447
fix private key validation and base58 invalid tests
2014-03-19 19:00:45 -03:00
3cd4e31c31
fix Address validation issue
2014-03-19 18:44:24 -03:00
2323e2a67a
fix skipped Opcode test
2014-03-19 18:10:04 -03:00
f2be0f386c
add hex generation of addresses test
2014-03-19 17:57:28 -03:00
53eb98babc
should generate from hex added
2014-03-19 17:52:34 -03:00
d84dc652d9
refactor valid b58 tests
2014-03-19 17:35:14 -03:00
f0b9cd0cab
complete base58_keys_valid tests
2014-03-19 17:12:24 -03:00
4b430be5c8
add base58key tests for Address case
2014-03-19 16:25:23 -03:00
1324974c4d
add isScript to Address
2014-03-19 16:20:41 -03:00
c6dcbc256b
Merge pull request #169 from maraoz/feature/add-bitcoin-core-tests
...
add bitcoin core ScriptInterpreter valid/invalid script tests
2014-03-19 10:21:57 -07:00
cfe899ee76
fix Transaction#create tests
2014-03-19 13:16:01 -03:00
Matias Alejo Garcia
Ryan X. Charles
Manuel Araoz
HeavyWeight
MattFaus