ZcashLightClientKit/Sources/ZcashLightClientKit/Synchronizer/ClosureSDKSynchronizer.swift

245 lines
9.3 KiB
Swift
Raw Normal View History

[#831] Add SDKSynchronizer wrappers for non-async API This change introduces two new protocols: `ClosureSynchronizer` and `CombineSynchronizer`. These two protocols define API that doesn't use `async`. So the client can choose exactly which API it wants to use. This change also introduces two new objects: `ClosureSDKSynchronizer` and `CombineSDKSynchronizer`. These two implement the respective protocols mentioned above. Both are structures. Neither of these two keeps any state. Thanks to this each is very cheap to create. And usage of these two isn't mutually exclusive. So devs can really choose the best SDK API for each part of the client app. [#831] Use async inside of the SDKSynchronizer - In general lot of methods inside the `SDKSynchronizer` and `CompactBlockProcessoer` which weren't async are now async. And other changes are made because of this change. - `CompactBlockProcessor` no longer uses Combine to communicate with `SDKSynchronizer`. Reason for this is that Combine doesn't play great with async. Closure passed to `sink` isn't async. - Because of this and because of how our tests work (receiving signals from CBP directly) `CompactBlockProcessor` must be able to handle more event closures. Not just one. So it now has `eventClosures` dictionary. It's little bit strange but it works fine. - `SyncStatus` inside the `SDKSynchronizer` was previously protected by lock. Now it's protected by simple actor wrapper. - Changes in tests are minimal. Changes were mady only because `CompactBlockProcessor` changes from Combine to closures. [#831] Add tests for ClosureSDKSynchronizer - Added tests are testing in general if the `ClosuresSDKSynchronizer` is correctly calling `Synchronizer` and if the values are correctly returned. - `ClosuresSDKSynchronizer` doesn't contain any logic but it is public API and we should be sure that it works correctly. [#831] Add tests for CombineSDKSynchronizer [#831] Add changelog
2023-03-16 02:11:18 -07:00
//
// ClosureSDKSynchronizer.swift
//
//
// Created by Michal Fousek on 20.03.2023.
//
import Combine
import Foundation
/// This is a super thin layer that implements the `ClosureSynchronizer` protocol and translates the async API defined in `Synchronizer` to
/// closure-based API. And it doesn't do anything else. It doesn't keep any state. It's here so each client can choose the API that suits its case
/// the best. And usage of this can be combined with usage of `CombineSDKSynchronizer`. So devs can really choose the best SDK API for each part of the
/// client app.
///
/// If you are looking for documentation for a specific method or property look for it in the `Synchronizer` protocol.
public struct ClosureSDKSynchronizer {
private let synchronizer: Synchronizer
public init(synchronizer: Synchronizer) {
self.synchronizer = synchronizer
}
}
extension ClosureSDKSynchronizer: ClosureSynchronizer {
[#209] Add support for multiple instances of the SDKSynchronizer Closes #209. [#845] Introduce ZcashSynchronizerAlias enum Closes #845. [#852] SDKSynchronizer using queues label based on the alias Closes #852. [#847] Remove posibility to use DatabaseStorageManager as singleton Closes #847. [#850] Remove synchronizerConnectionStateChanged notification Closes #850. [#855] Add check if the Alias is already used Closes #855 - Added `UsedAliasesChecker` utility which is used to register aliases that are in use. - `prepare()` and `wipe()` methods now check if the current alias can't be used and if not then `InitializerError.aliasAlreadyInUse` is thrown/emitted. - Some public methods that could cause harm if used with the Alias that is already in use now throw `SynchronizerError.notPrepared`. Thanks to this the client app is forced to call `prepare()` first. And `prepare()` does check for the Alias. - Added tests for new conditions. [#849] Make InternalSyncProgress aware of the Alias Closes #849. [#853] Only instance with default Alias migrates legacy cache DB Closes #853. [#851] Apply the Alias to the URLs Closes #851. - `Initializer` now updates paths according to alias before paths are used anywhere in the SDK. - Paths update can fail. It would be incovenient for the client apps to handle errors thrown from `Initiliazer` constructor. So the error is then handled in `SDKSynchronizer.prepare()` or `SDKSynchronizer.wipe()`. [#846] Stop using SDKMetrics as singleton (#862) - metrics are not longer a singleton - tests fixed - metrics outside init of the synchronizer [#848] Make logger aware of the alias - logger is now an instance passed throughout the sdk instead of a static proxy [#848] Make logger aware of the alias (#868) - comments addressed [#848] Make logger aware of the alias (#868) - returning protocol back Fix typos [#856] Add possibility to test multiple synchronizers in the sample app Closes #856. - Added `alias` property to `Synchronizer`. - Added `SyncBlocksListViewController` which provides UI to use multiple synchronizers at once. [#209] Add changelog - Add changelog for #209. - Overall improve readability of the rendered changelog. Tickets references are now prefixed with `###` instead of `- `. Fix compilation
2023-03-22 05:47:32 -07:00
public var alias: ZcashSynchronizerAlias { synchronizer.alias }
[#831] Add SDKSynchronizer wrappers for non-async API This change introduces two new protocols: `ClosureSynchronizer` and `CombineSynchronizer`. These two protocols define API that doesn't use `async`. So the client can choose exactly which API it wants to use. This change also introduces two new objects: `ClosureSDKSynchronizer` and `CombineSDKSynchronizer`. These two implement the respective protocols mentioned above. Both are structures. Neither of these two keeps any state. Thanks to this each is very cheap to create. And usage of these two isn't mutually exclusive. So devs can really choose the best SDK API for each part of the client app. [#831] Use async inside of the SDKSynchronizer - In general lot of methods inside the `SDKSynchronizer` and `CompactBlockProcessoer` which weren't async are now async. And other changes are made because of this change. - `CompactBlockProcessor` no longer uses Combine to communicate with `SDKSynchronizer`. Reason for this is that Combine doesn't play great with async. Closure passed to `sink` isn't async. - Because of this and because of how our tests work (receiving signals from CBP directly) `CompactBlockProcessor` must be able to handle more event closures. Not just one. So it now has `eventClosures` dictionary. It's little bit strange but it works fine. - `SyncStatus` inside the `SDKSynchronizer` was previously protected by lock. Now it's protected by simple actor wrapper. - Changes in tests are minimal. Changes were mady only because `CompactBlockProcessor` changes from Combine to closures. [#831] Add tests for ClosureSDKSynchronizer - Added tests are testing in general if the `ClosuresSDKSynchronizer` is correctly calling `Synchronizer` and if the values are correctly returned. - `ClosuresSDKSynchronizer` doesn't contain any logic but it is public API and we should be sure that it works correctly. [#831] Add tests for CombineSDKSynchronizer [#831] Add changelog
2023-03-16 02:11:18 -07:00
public var latestState: SynchronizerState { synchronizer.latestState }
public var connectionState: ConnectionState { synchronizer.connectionState }
public var stateStream: AnyPublisher<SynchronizerState, Never> { synchronizer.stateStream }
public var eventStream: AnyPublisher<SynchronizerEvent, Never> { synchronizer.eventStream }
public func prepare(
with seed: [UInt8]?,
viewingKeys: [UnifiedFullViewingKey],
walletBirthday: BlockHeight,
completion: @escaping (Result<Initializer.InitializationResult, Error>) -> Void
) {
executeThrowingAction(completion) {
return try await self.synchronizer.prepare(with: seed, viewingKeys: viewingKeys, walletBirthday: walletBirthday)
}
}
public func start(retry: Bool, completion: @escaping (Error?) -> Void) {
executeThrowingAction(completion) {
try await self.synchronizer.start(retry: retry)
}
}
public func stop(completion: @escaping () -> Void) {
executeAction(completion) {
await self.synchronizer.stop()
}
}
public func getSaplingAddress(accountIndex: Int, completion: @escaping (Result<SaplingAddress, Error>) -> Void) {
executeThrowingAction(completion) {
try await self.synchronizer.getSaplingAddress(accountIndex: accountIndex)
[#831] Add SDKSynchronizer wrappers for non-async API This change introduces two new protocols: `ClosureSynchronizer` and `CombineSynchronizer`. These two protocols define API that doesn't use `async`. So the client can choose exactly which API it wants to use. This change also introduces two new objects: `ClosureSDKSynchronizer` and `CombineSDKSynchronizer`. These two implement the respective protocols mentioned above. Both are structures. Neither of these two keeps any state. Thanks to this each is very cheap to create. And usage of these two isn't mutually exclusive. So devs can really choose the best SDK API for each part of the client app. [#831] Use async inside of the SDKSynchronizer - In general lot of methods inside the `SDKSynchronizer` and `CompactBlockProcessoer` which weren't async are now async. And other changes are made because of this change. - `CompactBlockProcessor` no longer uses Combine to communicate with `SDKSynchronizer`. Reason for this is that Combine doesn't play great with async. Closure passed to `sink` isn't async. - Because of this and because of how our tests work (receiving signals from CBP directly) `CompactBlockProcessor` must be able to handle more event closures. Not just one. So it now has `eventClosures` dictionary. It's little bit strange but it works fine. - `SyncStatus` inside the `SDKSynchronizer` was previously protected by lock. Now it's protected by simple actor wrapper. - Changes in tests are minimal. Changes were mady only because `CompactBlockProcessor` changes from Combine to closures. [#831] Add tests for ClosureSDKSynchronizer - Added tests are testing in general if the `ClosuresSDKSynchronizer` is correctly calling `Synchronizer` and if the values are correctly returned. - `ClosuresSDKSynchronizer` doesn't contain any logic but it is public API and we should be sure that it works correctly. [#831] Add tests for CombineSDKSynchronizer [#831] Add changelog
2023-03-16 02:11:18 -07:00
}
}
public func getUnifiedAddress(accountIndex: Int, completion: @escaping (Result<UnifiedAddress, Error>) -> Void) {
executeThrowingAction(completion) {
try await self.synchronizer.getUnifiedAddress(accountIndex: accountIndex)
[#831] Add SDKSynchronizer wrappers for non-async API This change introduces two new protocols: `ClosureSynchronizer` and `CombineSynchronizer`. These two protocols define API that doesn't use `async`. So the client can choose exactly which API it wants to use. This change also introduces two new objects: `ClosureSDKSynchronizer` and `CombineSDKSynchronizer`. These two implement the respective protocols mentioned above. Both are structures. Neither of these two keeps any state. Thanks to this each is very cheap to create. And usage of these two isn't mutually exclusive. So devs can really choose the best SDK API for each part of the client app. [#831] Use async inside of the SDKSynchronizer - In general lot of methods inside the `SDKSynchronizer` and `CompactBlockProcessoer` which weren't async are now async. And other changes are made because of this change. - `CompactBlockProcessor` no longer uses Combine to communicate with `SDKSynchronizer`. Reason for this is that Combine doesn't play great with async. Closure passed to `sink` isn't async. - Because of this and because of how our tests work (receiving signals from CBP directly) `CompactBlockProcessor` must be able to handle more event closures. Not just one. So it now has `eventClosures` dictionary. It's little bit strange but it works fine. - `SyncStatus` inside the `SDKSynchronizer` was previously protected by lock. Now it's protected by simple actor wrapper. - Changes in tests are minimal. Changes were mady only because `CompactBlockProcessor` changes from Combine to closures. [#831] Add tests for ClosureSDKSynchronizer - Added tests are testing in general if the `ClosuresSDKSynchronizer` is correctly calling `Synchronizer` and if the values are correctly returned. - `ClosuresSDKSynchronizer` doesn't contain any logic but it is public API and we should be sure that it works correctly. [#831] Add tests for CombineSDKSynchronizer [#831] Add changelog
2023-03-16 02:11:18 -07:00
}
}
public func getTransparentAddress(accountIndex: Int, completion: @escaping (Result<TransparentAddress, Error>) -> Void) {
executeThrowingAction(completion) {
try await self.synchronizer.getTransparentAddress(accountIndex: accountIndex)
[#831] Add SDKSynchronizer wrappers for non-async API This change introduces two new protocols: `ClosureSynchronizer` and `CombineSynchronizer`. These two protocols define API that doesn't use `async`. So the client can choose exactly which API it wants to use. This change also introduces two new objects: `ClosureSDKSynchronizer` and `CombineSDKSynchronizer`. These two implement the respective protocols mentioned above. Both are structures. Neither of these two keeps any state. Thanks to this each is very cheap to create. And usage of these two isn't mutually exclusive. So devs can really choose the best SDK API for each part of the client app. [#831] Use async inside of the SDKSynchronizer - In general lot of methods inside the `SDKSynchronizer` and `CompactBlockProcessoer` which weren't async are now async. And other changes are made because of this change. - `CompactBlockProcessor` no longer uses Combine to communicate with `SDKSynchronizer`. Reason for this is that Combine doesn't play great with async. Closure passed to `sink` isn't async. - Because of this and because of how our tests work (receiving signals from CBP directly) `CompactBlockProcessor` must be able to handle more event closures. Not just one. So it now has `eventClosures` dictionary. It's little bit strange but it works fine. - `SyncStatus` inside the `SDKSynchronizer` was previously protected by lock. Now it's protected by simple actor wrapper. - Changes in tests are minimal. Changes were mady only because `CompactBlockProcessor` changes from Combine to closures. [#831] Add tests for ClosureSDKSynchronizer - Added tests are testing in general if the `ClosuresSDKSynchronizer` is correctly calling `Synchronizer` and if the values are correctly returned. - `ClosuresSDKSynchronizer` doesn't contain any logic but it is public API and we should be sure that it works correctly. [#831] Add tests for CombineSDKSynchronizer [#831] Add changelog
2023-03-16 02:11:18 -07:00
}
}
public func sendToAddress(
spendingKey: UnifiedSpendingKey,
zatoshi: Zatoshi,
toAddress: Recipient,
memo: Memo?,
completion: @escaping (Result<PendingTransactionEntity, Error>) -> Void
) {
executeThrowingAction(completion) {
try await self.synchronizer.sendToAddress(spendingKey: spendingKey, zatoshi: zatoshi, toAddress: toAddress, memo: memo)
}
}
public func shieldFunds(
spendingKey: UnifiedSpendingKey,
memo: Memo,
shieldingThreshold: Zatoshi,
completion: @escaping (Result<PendingTransactionEntity, Error>) -> Void
) {
executeThrowingAction(completion) {
try await self.synchronizer.shieldFunds(spendingKey: spendingKey, memo: memo, shieldingThreshold: shieldingThreshold)
}
}
public func cancelSpend(transaction: PendingTransactionEntity, completion: @escaping (Bool) -> Void) {
executeAction(completion) {
await self.synchronizer.cancelSpend(transaction: transaction)
}
}
public func pendingTransactions(completion: @escaping ([PendingTransactionEntity]) -> Void) {
executeAction(completion) {
await self.synchronizer.pendingTransactions
}
}
public func clearedTransactions(completion: @escaping ([ZcashTransaction.Overview]) -> Void) {
executeAction(completion) {
await self.synchronizer.clearedTransactions
}
}
public func sentTranscations(completion: @escaping ([ZcashTransaction.Sent]) -> Void) {
executeAction(completion) {
await self.synchronizer.sentTransactions
}
}
[#831] Add SDKSynchronizer wrappers for non-async API This change introduces two new protocols: `ClosureSynchronizer` and `CombineSynchronizer`. These two protocols define API that doesn't use `async`. So the client can choose exactly which API it wants to use. This change also introduces two new objects: `ClosureSDKSynchronizer` and `CombineSDKSynchronizer`. These two implement the respective protocols mentioned above. Both are structures. Neither of these two keeps any state. Thanks to this each is very cheap to create. And usage of these two isn't mutually exclusive. So devs can really choose the best SDK API for each part of the client app. [#831] Use async inside of the SDKSynchronizer - In general lot of methods inside the `SDKSynchronizer` and `CompactBlockProcessoer` which weren't async are now async. And other changes are made because of this change. - `CompactBlockProcessor` no longer uses Combine to communicate with `SDKSynchronizer`. Reason for this is that Combine doesn't play great with async. Closure passed to `sink` isn't async. - Because of this and because of how our tests work (receiving signals from CBP directly) `CompactBlockProcessor` must be able to handle more event closures. Not just one. So it now has `eventClosures` dictionary. It's little bit strange but it works fine. - `SyncStatus` inside the `SDKSynchronizer` was previously protected by lock. Now it's protected by simple actor wrapper. - Changes in tests are minimal. Changes were mady only because `CompactBlockProcessor` changes from Combine to closures. [#831] Add tests for ClosureSDKSynchronizer - Added tests are testing in general if the `ClosuresSDKSynchronizer` is correctly calling `Synchronizer` and if the values are correctly returned. - `ClosuresSDKSynchronizer` doesn't contain any logic but it is public API and we should be sure that it works correctly. [#831] Add tests for CombineSDKSynchronizer [#831] Add changelog
2023-03-16 02:11:18 -07:00
public func receivedTransactions(completion: @escaping ([ZcashTransaction.Received]) -> Void) {
executeAction(completion) {
await self.synchronizer.receivedTransactions
}
}
[#831] Add SDKSynchronizer wrappers for non-async API This change introduces two new protocols: `ClosureSynchronizer` and `CombineSynchronizer`. These two protocols define API that doesn't use `async`. So the client can choose exactly which API it wants to use. This change also introduces two new objects: `ClosureSDKSynchronizer` and `CombineSDKSynchronizer`. These two implement the respective protocols mentioned above. Both are structures. Neither of these two keeps any state. Thanks to this each is very cheap to create. And usage of these two isn't mutually exclusive. So devs can really choose the best SDK API for each part of the client app. [#831] Use async inside of the SDKSynchronizer - In general lot of methods inside the `SDKSynchronizer` and `CompactBlockProcessoer` which weren't async are now async. And other changes are made because of this change. - `CompactBlockProcessor` no longer uses Combine to communicate with `SDKSynchronizer`. Reason for this is that Combine doesn't play great with async. Closure passed to `sink` isn't async. - Because of this and because of how our tests work (receiving signals from CBP directly) `CompactBlockProcessor` must be able to handle more event closures. Not just one. So it now has `eventClosures` dictionary. It's little bit strange but it works fine. - `SyncStatus` inside the `SDKSynchronizer` was previously protected by lock. Now it's protected by simple actor wrapper. - Changes in tests are minimal. Changes were mady only because `CompactBlockProcessor` changes from Combine to closures. [#831] Add tests for ClosureSDKSynchronizer - Added tests are testing in general if the `ClosuresSDKSynchronizer` is correctly calling `Synchronizer` and if the values are correctly returned. - `ClosuresSDKSynchronizer` doesn't contain any logic but it is public API and we should be sure that it works correctly. [#831] Add tests for CombineSDKSynchronizer [#831] Add changelog
2023-03-16 02:11:18 -07:00
public func paginatedTransactions(of kind: TransactionKind) -> PaginatedTransactionRepository { synchronizer.paginatedTransactions(of: kind) }
public func getMemos(for transaction: ZcashTransaction.Overview, completion: @escaping (Result<[Memo], Error>) -> Void) {
executeThrowingAction(completion) {
try await self.synchronizer.getMemos(for: transaction)
}
}
public func getMemos(for receivedTransaction: ZcashTransaction.Received, completion: @escaping (Result<[Memo], Error>) -> Void) {
executeThrowingAction(completion) {
try await self.synchronizer.getMemos(for: receivedTransaction)
}
}
[#831] Add SDKSynchronizer wrappers for non-async API This change introduces two new protocols: `ClosureSynchronizer` and `CombineSynchronizer`. These two protocols define API that doesn't use `async`. So the client can choose exactly which API it wants to use. This change also introduces two new objects: `ClosureSDKSynchronizer` and `CombineSDKSynchronizer`. These two implement the respective protocols mentioned above. Both are structures. Neither of these two keeps any state. Thanks to this each is very cheap to create. And usage of these two isn't mutually exclusive. So devs can really choose the best SDK API for each part of the client app. [#831] Use async inside of the SDKSynchronizer - In general lot of methods inside the `SDKSynchronizer` and `CompactBlockProcessoer` which weren't async are now async. And other changes are made because of this change. - `CompactBlockProcessor` no longer uses Combine to communicate with `SDKSynchronizer`. Reason for this is that Combine doesn't play great with async. Closure passed to `sink` isn't async. - Because of this and because of how our tests work (receiving signals from CBP directly) `CompactBlockProcessor` must be able to handle more event closures. Not just one. So it now has `eventClosures` dictionary. It's little bit strange but it works fine. - `SyncStatus` inside the `SDKSynchronizer` was previously protected by lock. Now it's protected by simple actor wrapper. - Changes in tests are minimal. Changes were mady only because `CompactBlockProcessor` changes from Combine to closures. [#831] Add tests for ClosureSDKSynchronizer - Added tests are testing in general if the `ClosuresSDKSynchronizer` is correctly calling `Synchronizer` and if the values are correctly returned. - `ClosuresSDKSynchronizer` doesn't contain any logic but it is public API and we should be sure that it works correctly. [#831] Add tests for CombineSDKSynchronizer [#831] Add changelog
2023-03-16 02:11:18 -07:00
public func getMemos(for sentTransaction: ZcashTransaction.Sent, completion: @escaping (Result<[Memo], Error>) -> Void) {
executeThrowingAction(completion) {
try await self.synchronizer.getMemos(for: sentTransaction)
}
}
[#831] Add SDKSynchronizer wrappers for non-async API This change introduces two new protocols: `ClosureSynchronizer` and `CombineSynchronizer`. These two protocols define API that doesn't use `async`. So the client can choose exactly which API it wants to use. This change also introduces two new objects: `ClosureSDKSynchronizer` and `CombineSDKSynchronizer`. These two implement the respective protocols mentioned above. Both are structures. Neither of these two keeps any state. Thanks to this each is very cheap to create. And usage of these two isn't mutually exclusive. So devs can really choose the best SDK API for each part of the client app. [#831] Use async inside of the SDKSynchronizer - In general lot of methods inside the `SDKSynchronizer` and `CompactBlockProcessoer` which weren't async are now async. And other changes are made because of this change. - `CompactBlockProcessor` no longer uses Combine to communicate with `SDKSynchronizer`. Reason for this is that Combine doesn't play great with async. Closure passed to `sink` isn't async. - Because of this and because of how our tests work (receiving signals from CBP directly) `CompactBlockProcessor` must be able to handle more event closures. Not just one. So it now has `eventClosures` dictionary. It's little bit strange but it works fine. - `SyncStatus` inside the `SDKSynchronizer` was previously protected by lock. Now it's protected by simple actor wrapper. - Changes in tests are minimal. Changes were mady only because `CompactBlockProcessor` changes from Combine to closures. [#831] Add tests for ClosureSDKSynchronizer - Added tests are testing in general if the `ClosuresSDKSynchronizer` is correctly calling `Synchronizer` and if the values are correctly returned. - `ClosuresSDKSynchronizer` doesn't contain any logic but it is public API and we should be sure that it works correctly. [#831] Add tests for CombineSDKSynchronizer [#831] Add changelog
2023-03-16 02:11:18 -07:00
public func getRecipients(for transaction: ZcashTransaction.Overview, completion: @escaping ([TransactionRecipient]) -> Void) {
executeAction(completion) {
await self.synchronizer.getRecipients(for: transaction)
}
}
public func getRecipients(for transaction: ZcashTransaction.Sent, completion: @escaping ([TransactionRecipient]) -> Void) {
executeAction(completion) {
await self.synchronizer.getRecipients(for: transaction)
}
}
public func allConfirmedTransactions(
from transaction: ZcashTransaction.Overview,
limit: Int,
completion: @escaping (Result<[ZcashTransaction.Overview], Error>) -> Void
) {
executeThrowingAction(completion) {
try await self.synchronizer.allConfirmedTransactions(from: transaction, limit: limit)
}
[#831] Add SDKSynchronizer wrappers for non-async API This change introduces two new protocols: `ClosureSynchronizer` and `CombineSynchronizer`. These two protocols define API that doesn't use `async`. So the client can choose exactly which API it wants to use. This change also introduces two new objects: `ClosureSDKSynchronizer` and `CombineSDKSynchronizer`. These two implement the respective protocols mentioned above. Both are structures. Neither of these two keeps any state. Thanks to this each is very cheap to create. And usage of these two isn't mutually exclusive. So devs can really choose the best SDK API for each part of the client app. [#831] Use async inside of the SDKSynchronizer - In general lot of methods inside the `SDKSynchronizer` and `CompactBlockProcessoer` which weren't async are now async. And other changes are made because of this change. - `CompactBlockProcessor` no longer uses Combine to communicate with `SDKSynchronizer`. Reason for this is that Combine doesn't play great with async. Closure passed to `sink` isn't async. - Because of this and because of how our tests work (receiving signals from CBP directly) `CompactBlockProcessor` must be able to handle more event closures. Not just one. So it now has `eventClosures` dictionary. It's little bit strange but it works fine. - `SyncStatus` inside the `SDKSynchronizer` was previously protected by lock. Now it's protected by simple actor wrapper. - Changes in tests are minimal. Changes were mady only because `CompactBlockProcessor` changes from Combine to closures. [#831] Add tests for ClosureSDKSynchronizer - Added tests are testing in general if the `ClosuresSDKSynchronizer` is correctly calling `Synchronizer` and if the values are correctly returned. - `ClosuresSDKSynchronizer` doesn't contain any logic but it is public API and we should be sure that it works correctly. [#831] Add tests for CombineSDKSynchronizer [#831] Add changelog
2023-03-16 02:11:18 -07:00
}
public func latestHeight(completion: @escaping (Result<BlockHeight, Error>) -> Void) {
executeThrowingAction(completion) {
try await self.synchronizer.latestHeight()
}
}
public func refreshUTXOs(address: TransparentAddress, from height: BlockHeight, completion: @escaping (Result<RefreshedUTXOs, Error>) -> Void) {
executeThrowingAction(completion) {
try await self.synchronizer.refreshUTXOs(address: address, from: height)
}
}
public func getTransparentBalance(accountIndex: Int, completion: @escaping (Result<WalletBalance, Error>) -> Void) {
executeThrowingAction(completion) {
try await self.synchronizer.getTransparentBalance(accountIndex: accountIndex)
}
}
public func getShieldedBalance(accountIndex: Int, completion: @escaping (Result<Zatoshi, Error>) -> Void) {
executeThrowingAction(completion) {
try await self.synchronizer.getShieldedBalance(accountIndex: accountIndex)
}
}
[#831] Add SDKSynchronizer wrappers for non-async API This change introduces two new protocols: `ClosureSynchronizer` and `CombineSynchronizer`. These two protocols define API that doesn't use `async`. So the client can choose exactly which API it wants to use. This change also introduces two new objects: `ClosureSDKSynchronizer` and `CombineSDKSynchronizer`. These two implement the respective protocols mentioned above. Both are structures. Neither of these two keeps any state. Thanks to this each is very cheap to create. And usage of these two isn't mutually exclusive. So devs can really choose the best SDK API for each part of the client app. [#831] Use async inside of the SDKSynchronizer - In general lot of methods inside the `SDKSynchronizer` and `CompactBlockProcessoer` which weren't async are now async. And other changes are made because of this change. - `CompactBlockProcessor` no longer uses Combine to communicate with `SDKSynchronizer`. Reason for this is that Combine doesn't play great with async. Closure passed to `sink` isn't async. - Because of this and because of how our tests work (receiving signals from CBP directly) `CompactBlockProcessor` must be able to handle more event closures. Not just one. So it now has `eventClosures` dictionary. It's little bit strange but it works fine. - `SyncStatus` inside the `SDKSynchronizer` was previously protected by lock. Now it's protected by simple actor wrapper. - Changes in tests are minimal. Changes were mady only because `CompactBlockProcessor` changes from Combine to closures. [#831] Add tests for ClosureSDKSynchronizer - Added tests are testing in general if the `ClosuresSDKSynchronizer` is correctly calling `Synchronizer` and if the values are correctly returned. - `ClosuresSDKSynchronizer` doesn't contain any logic but it is public API and we should be sure that it works correctly. [#831] Add tests for CombineSDKSynchronizer [#831] Add changelog
2023-03-16 02:11:18 -07:00
public func getShieldedVerifiedBalance(accountIndex: Int, completion: @escaping (Result<Zatoshi, Error>) -> Void) {
executeThrowingAction(completion) {
try await self.synchronizer.getShieldedVerifiedBalance(accountIndex: accountIndex)
}
}
[#831] Add SDKSynchronizer wrappers for non-async API This change introduces two new protocols: `ClosureSynchronizer` and `CombineSynchronizer`. These two protocols define API that doesn't use `async`. So the client can choose exactly which API it wants to use. This change also introduces two new objects: `ClosureSDKSynchronizer` and `CombineSDKSynchronizer`. These two implement the respective protocols mentioned above. Both are structures. Neither of these two keeps any state. Thanks to this each is very cheap to create. And usage of these two isn't mutually exclusive. So devs can really choose the best SDK API for each part of the client app. [#831] Use async inside of the SDKSynchronizer - In general lot of methods inside the `SDKSynchronizer` and `CompactBlockProcessoer` which weren't async are now async. And other changes are made because of this change. - `CompactBlockProcessor` no longer uses Combine to communicate with `SDKSynchronizer`. Reason for this is that Combine doesn't play great with async. Closure passed to `sink` isn't async. - Because of this and because of how our tests work (receiving signals from CBP directly) `CompactBlockProcessor` must be able to handle more event closures. Not just one. So it now has `eventClosures` dictionary. It's little bit strange but it works fine. - `SyncStatus` inside the `SDKSynchronizer` was previously protected by lock. Now it's protected by simple actor wrapper. - Changes in tests are minimal. Changes were mady only because `CompactBlockProcessor` changes from Combine to closures. [#831] Add tests for ClosureSDKSynchronizer - Added tests are testing in general if the `ClosuresSDKSynchronizer` is correctly calling `Synchronizer` and if the values are correctly returned. - `ClosuresSDKSynchronizer` doesn't contain any logic but it is public API and we should be sure that it works correctly. [#831] Add tests for CombineSDKSynchronizer [#831] Add changelog
2023-03-16 02:11:18 -07:00
/*
It can be missleading that these two methods are returning Publisher even this protocol is closure based. Reason is that Synchronizer doesn't
provide different implementations for these two methods. So Combine it is even here.
*/
2023-04-03 08:19:40 -07:00
public func rewind(_ policy: RewindPolicy) -> CompletablePublisher<Error> { synchronizer.rewind(policy) }
public func wipe() -> CompletablePublisher<Error> { synchronizer.wipe() }
[#831] Add SDKSynchronizer wrappers for non-async API This change introduces two new protocols: `ClosureSynchronizer` and `CombineSynchronizer`. These two protocols define API that doesn't use `async`. So the client can choose exactly which API it wants to use. This change also introduces two new objects: `ClosureSDKSynchronizer` and `CombineSDKSynchronizer`. These two implement the respective protocols mentioned above. Both are structures. Neither of these two keeps any state. Thanks to this each is very cheap to create. And usage of these two isn't mutually exclusive. So devs can really choose the best SDK API for each part of the client app. [#831] Use async inside of the SDKSynchronizer - In general lot of methods inside the `SDKSynchronizer` and `CompactBlockProcessoer` which weren't async are now async. And other changes are made because of this change. - `CompactBlockProcessor` no longer uses Combine to communicate with `SDKSynchronizer`. Reason for this is that Combine doesn't play great with async. Closure passed to `sink` isn't async. - Because of this and because of how our tests work (receiving signals from CBP directly) `CompactBlockProcessor` must be able to handle more event closures. Not just one. So it now has `eventClosures` dictionary. It's little bit strange but it works fine. - `SyncStatus` inside the `SDKSynchronizer` was previously protected by lock. Now it's protected by simple actor wrapper. - Changes in tests are minimal. Changes were mady only because `CompactBlockProcessor` changes from Combine to closures. [#831] Add tests for ClosureSDKSynchronizer - Added tests are testing in general if the `ClosuresSDKSynchronizer` is correctly calling `Synchronizer` and if the values are correctly returned. - `ClosuresSDKSynchronizer` doesn't contain any logic but it is public API and we should be sure that it works correctly. [#831] Add tests for CombineSDKSynchronizer [#831] Add changelog
2023-03-16 02:11:18 -07:00
}
extension ClosureSDKSynchronizer {
private func executeAction(_ completion: @escaping () -> Void, action: @escaping () async -> Void) {
Task {
await action()
completion()
}
}
private func executeAction<R>(_ completion: @escaping (R) -> Void, action: @escaping () async -> R) {
Task {
let result = await action()
completion(result)
}
}
private func executeThrowingAction(_ completion: @escaping (Error?) -> Void, action: @escaping () async throws -> Void) {
Task {
do {
try await action()
completion(nil)
} catch {
completion(error)
}
}
}
private func executeThrowingAction<R>(_ completion: @escaping (Result<R, Error>) -> Void, action: @escaping () async throws -> R) {
Task {
do {
let result = try await action()
completion(.success(result))
} catch {
completion(.failure(error))
}
}
}
}