This also removes the zcash_client_sqlite-specific database
initialization procedures in favor of a standardized approach using the
methods available via the data access API.
When `force_rescans` is set to `true` in a call to
`replace_queue_entries`, previously scanned ranges will have their
existing priority overwritten by the scan priority for a provided range;
otherwise, the existing scan priority dominance rule continues to be
enforced. This enables us to require previously scanned ranges be
re-scanned without interfering with higher-priority scan operations.
This change modifies the implementation of `get_spendable_sapling_notes`
and `select_spendable_sapling_notes` to only return notes at positions
where the associated note commitment tree shard has been fully scanned.
This is slightly more conservative than it needs to be, because
there could be cases where witnesses imported into the tree in the
`shardtree_support` migration cover the complete range of a subtree (and
hence that subtree doesn't need to be re-scanned). However, we can't
detect or depend upon that condition in general without attempting to
create a witness for each note retrieved.
A possible alternative to this approach would be to not bound our query
results on the requested total, and instead attempt to construct a
witness for each note we retrieve, skipping the note if we cannot
construct a witness. However, given that accessing the note commitment
tree can be a costly operation requiring nontrivial deserialization
costs, the more conservative database-oriented approach is perhaps
better.
Prior to the scan-before-sync changes, the wallet was able to assume
that the maximum scanned block height at the time of the spend was
within a few blocks of the chain tip. However, under linear scanning
after the spend-before-sync changes this invariant no longer holds,
resulting in a situation where in linear sync conditions the wallet
could attempt to create transactions with already-past expiry heights.
This change separates the notion of "chain tip" from "max scanned
height", relying upon the `scan_queue` table to maintain the wallet's
view of the consensus chain height and using information from the
`blocks` table only in situations where the latest and/or earliest
scanned height is required.
As part of this change, the `WalletRead` interface is also modified to
disambiguate these concepts.
Previously this was not clearly specified, and the implementations in
`zcash_client_sqlite` behaved similarly to when `from_height = None`.
Closeszcash/librustzcash#892.
In general, it is preferable to use globally relevant identifiers where
possible. This PR removes the `WalletRead::TxRef` associated type in
favor of using `TxId` directly for the transaction identifier, and
restricts the use of the `NoteRef` type to those scenarios where the
result of one query is intended to be used directly as the input to
another query.
Closes#834
The `add_checkpoint` method is intended to be idempotent. In the case
that we add a checkpoint at an already-checkpointed block height, we
should only raise an error in the case that the note commitment tree
position or the set of notes spent in the checkpointed block has
changed.
The `shardtree` migration is applied to a database state that was
created via linear scanning, so we have complete wallet information for
those blocks.
We only need to load frontiers into the ShardTree that are close enough
to the wallet's known chain tip to fill `PRUNING_DEPTH` checkpoints, so
that ShardTree's witness generation will be able to correctly handle
anchor depths. Loading frontiers further back than this doesn't add any
useful nodes to the ShardTree (as we don't support rollbacks beyond
`PRUNING_DEPTH`, and we won't be finding notes in earlier blocks), and
hurts performance (as frontier importing has a significant Merkle tree
hashing cost).
Closeszcash/librustzcash#877.
Previously `extended_range` only covered the extent of the leaves of
all subtrees in which notes were found during a scan. When the scanned
range was large, this was not guaranteed to be contained within the
subtree leaves, causing an assertion failure when an invalid `ScanRange`
was constructed.
The Merkle hashes used for the note commitment trees are domain
separated by level, so when pretending that the subtree roots are leaves
of the cap tree, we need to adjust for their level not being zero.
Closeszcash/librustzcash#874.
Co-authored-by: Sean Bowe <ewillbefull@gmail.com>
This implements a priority queue backed by the wallet database for scan
range ordering. The scan queue is updated on each call to `put_blocks`
or to `update_chain_tip`.
Instead of calling `put_block` for each block scanned,
`scan_cached_blocks` will now defer the block writes until the scan of a
batch is complete and will perform the block writes and note commitment
tree updates all within a single transaction.
This should ordinarily be fine in terms of memory consumption, because
the block data being saved is pruned to only that spend an output
information that is related to transactions in the wallet, which will
normally be sparse enough that the block range size that is appropriate
for a given platform to run within a batch scanner adequately bounds the
memory consumption of this pruned representation.
There are cases where we wish to return informaiton that is relevant to
a specific shielded protocol and `Transparent` is an invalid case. This
is a minor preparatory refactoring that makes this distinction
expressible.
In preparation for out-of-order range-based scanning, it is necessary
to ensure that the size of the Sapling note commitment tree is carried
along through the scan process and that stored blocks are always
persisted with the updated note commitment tree size.
Local chain validation will be performed internal to
`scan_cached_blocks`, and as handling of chain reorgs will need to
change to support out-of-order scanning, the `validate_chain` method
will be superfluous. It is removed in advance of other changes in order
to avoid updating it to reflect the forthcoming changes.
We move thes fields out into a separate BlockMetadata struct to ensure
that future additions to block metadata are structurally separated from
future additions to block data.
`rusqlite` includes a mechanism for creating prepared statements that
automatically caches them and reuses the caches when possible. This
means that it's unnecessary for us to do our own caching, and also
offers a minor performance improvement in that we don't need to eagerly
prepare statements that we may not execute in the lifetime of a given
`WalletDb` object. It also improves code locality, because the prepared
statements are now adjacent in the code to the parameter assignment
blocks that correspond to those statements.
This also updates a number of `put_x` methods to use sqlite upsert
functionality via the `ON CONFLICT` clause, instead of having to perform
separate inserts and updates.
Memos may be absent for both sent and received notes in cases where only
compact block information has been used to populate the wallet database.
This fixes a potential crash in the case that we attempt to decode a
SQLite `NULL` as a byte array.
Fixes#384
(cherry picked from commit d99b4d4d6e)
Memos may be absent for both sent and received notes in cases where only
compact block information has been used to populate the wallet database.
This fixes a potential crash in the case that we attempt to decode a
SQLite `NULL` as a byte array. It does, however, introduce a slight
semantic confusion that will need to be considered in the case of future
updates where a note may not have an associated memo; at present, the
only reason we might not have the memo is that we might not have
retrieved the full transaction information from the chain, but in the
future there might be other possible reasons for this absence.
Fixes#384
This removes the `CommitmentTree`, `IncrementalWitness`, and
`MerklePath` types in favor of equivalent versions available
from the `incrementalmerkletree` crate.
This is in preparation for extraction into the `incrementalmerkletree`
crate, which is not Sapling-specific and therefore cannot hard-code
the depths of these data structures.
This better reflects the semantics of wallet behavior. Also, this
adds a `zcash_client_backend::WalletRead::get_min_unspent_height`
method that replaces the deprecated & removed (and misleadingly
named) `get_rewind_height` method.
This change also settles on `account_value_delta` as the name of the
column in `v_transactions` that describes the transaction's effect on
the value of the associated account.
This removes the path-based dependencies on the `zcash_note_encryption`
crate in favor of using versioned dependencies locally. This better
reflects the future state in which `zcash_note_encryption` is factored
out of the workspace and maintained in a separate repository.
The `halo2_proofs/multicore` flag must be disabled when running wasm
builds; this ensures that we do not accidentally include it as a
transitive dependency when building with `--no-default-features`.
This change makes it possible for wallets using the
`zcash_client_backend::data_api::wallet` module to perform transaction
preparation, including input selection and fee calculation, as an
independent step prior to creating proofs and signatures. This can be
used to improve user experience by making it possible to report the
proposed effects of the transaction to the wallet user (including
privacy implications) prior to authorizing the transaction.
Previously, if a caller wanted to use a block source to perform
scanning from the first available block, they would have to guess
at the block height to start from. Changing this to an optional
argument makes this explicit.
This allows callers to validate smaller intervals of the given
`BlockSourceT` shortening processing times of the function call at the
expense of obtaining a partial result on a given section of interest of
the block source.
`params: &ParamsT` has been removed from the arguments since they were
only needed to fall back to `sapling_activation_height` when `None` as
passed as the `validate_from` argument. Passing `None` as validation
start point on a pre-populated `block_source` would result in an error
`ChainError::block_height_discontinuity(sapling_activation_height - 1, current_height)`
With this new API callers must specify a concrete `validate_from`
argument and assume that `validate_chain` will not take any default
fallbacks to chain `ParamsT`.
The addition of a `limit` to the chain validation function changes the
meaning of its successful output, being now a `BlockHeight, BlockHash)`
tuple indicating the block height and block hash up to which the chain
as been validated on its continuity of heights and hashes. Callers
providing a `limit` aregument are responsible of subsequent calls to
`validate_chain()` to complete validating the remaining blocks stored on
the `block_source`.
Closeszcash/librustzcash#705
The MSRVs of the component crates are left as-is, partly because our
dependencies don't require us to bump them, and partly because those
crates have no pending changes and are relatively stable. We also plan
to split the component crates out into a separate repository, where it
will be easier to have a separate MSRV.
Closeszcash/librustzcash#759.
The remaining uses of `assert!(matches!(...))` are all in cases where
for some reason the `assert_matches` macro interferes with correct
type inference.
The change selection algorithm has the most useful information for
determining whether or not a note is dust, so this adds a new error case
to `ChangeError` that allows the change selection to report the presence
of input notes without economic value back to its caller.
This adds a set of abstractions that allow wallets to provide
independent strategies for fee estimation and note selection, and
implementations of these strategies that perform these operations in the
same fashion as the existing `spend` and `shield_transparent_funds`
functions.
This required a somewhat hefty rework of the error handling in
zcash_client_backend. It fixes an issue with the error types whereby
callees needed to have a bit too much information about the error
types produced by their callers.
Reflect the updated note selection and error handling in zcash_client_sqlite.
Previously, `shield_transparent_funds` was only shielding funds
associated with the legacy default transparent address. This meant
that transparent funds sent to unified addresses could not reliably
be shielded, as a unified address will frequently be constructed
using a diversifier index greater than zero.
This modifies the `get_transparent_receivers` method to return address
metadata containing the account ID and diversifier index used to derive
each address along with the receiver.
The legacy transparent address is never added to the `addresses` table,
but we still need to be able to receive UTXOs sent to that address. So,
we add a special case for when a UTXO matches that legacy address, and
set the account ID to 0 manually.
This modifies `decrypt_and_store_transaction` to check for inputs
to a transaction being decrypted that correspond to utxos known
to our wallet. For each such UTXO found, it is marked spent.
These traits introduce a problem, in that constraints on a method cannot
be conditionally required based upon the presence or absence of a
feature flag. Instead, we make the methods previously introduced by
the removed traits present in all cases on the `WalletRead` and
`WalletWrite` traits, but ensure that their implementations return
an error if the caller attempts to use them in a wallet that has not
been configured with support for transparent inputs functionality.
Due to how the wallets retrieved unspent transparent outputs from the
light wallet server, the account associated with a particular UTXO may
not be known by the light wallet. Instead of requiring the caller to
perform a separate lookup and match the address of the received UTXO
with a known account, it's simpler to perform this lookup internally at
the time of insertion or update.
In order to make this operation more efficient, the `addresses_table`
migration is modified to add a column to cache the transparent receiver
so that it may be used in the joins in the UTXO insert and update
operations.
Since our migrations form a DAG, it doesn't make sense to only allow a
single migration to be specified for wallet initialization; instead,
allow multiple migrations so that one can hit all the desired leaves.
This adds sent and received note count information, transaction fees,
account information, and makes the information returned about sent
notes and received notes consistent with one another.
The currently deprecated implementations of `insert_sent_utxo`,
`insert_sent_note`, `put_sent_utxo` and `put_sent_note` all store to the
same `sent_notes` table internally. Since there's no immediate plan to
change this arrangement, it's better to have a single pair of internal
`insert_sent_output` and `put_sent_output` methods instead.
The previous approach to UTXO handling involved UTXO data being
deleted from the wallet after the relevant UTXOs had been spent.
However, this means that we can no longer accurately compute
transaction fees for the transactions spending those UTXOs.
The `net_value` of the resulting rows in v_transactions will be
null.