zec
/
zips
mirror of https://github.com/zcash/zips.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Correct a statement about indistinguishability of JoinSplit descriptions. 

Signed-off-by: Daira Hopwood <daira@jacaranda.org>
This commit is contained in:
Daira Hopwood 2017-03-07 20:53:25 +00:00
parent d4bfecea9b
commit 248567fbcd
1 changed files with 3 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

5
protocol/protocol.tex
View File

@ -1878,8 +1878,8 @@ treated like an \emph{output} value, whereas} $\vpubNew$ is treated like an
Unlike original \Zerocash \cite{BCG+2014}, \Zcash does not have
a distinction between Mint and Pour operations. The addition of $\vpubOld$ to a
\joinSplitDescription subsumes the functionality of both Mint and Pour. Also,
\joinSplitDescriptions are indistinguishable regardless of the number of real input
\notes.
a difference in the number of real input \notes does not by itself cause two
\joinSplitDescriptions to be distinguishable.
}
As stated in \crossref{joinsplitdesc}, either $\vpubOld$ or $\vpubNew$ \MUST be zero.
@ -4135,6 +4135,7 @@ The errors in the proof of Ledger Indistinguishability mentioned in
\item Clarify the consensus rule preventing double-spends.
\item Clarify what a \noteCommitment opens to in \crossref{crprf}.
\item Correct the order of arguments to $\Commit{}$ in \crossref{concretecomm}.
\item Correct a statement about indistinguishability of \joinSplitDescriptions.
\end{itemize}
\introlist