mirror of https://github.com/zcash/zips.git
Correct a statement about indistinguishability of JoinSplit descriptions.
Signed-off-by: Daira Hopwood <daira@jacaranda.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d4bfecea9b
commit
248567fbcd
|
@ -1878,8 +1878,8 @@ treated like an \emph{output} value, whereas} $\vpubNew$ is treated like an
|
||||||
Unlike original \Zerocash \cite{BCG+2014}, \Zcash does not have
|
Unlike original \Zerocash \cite{BCG+2014}, \Zcash does not have
|
||||||
a distinction between Mint and Pour operations. The addition of $\vpubOld$ to a
|
a distinction between Mint and Pour operations. The addition of $\vpubOld$ to a
|
||||||
\joinSplitDescription subsumes the functionality of both Mint and Pour. Also,
|
\joinSplitDescription subsumes the functionality of both Mint and Pour. Also,
|
||||||
\joinSplitDescriptions are indistinguishable regardless of the number of real input
|
a difference in the number of real input \notes does not by itself cause two
|
||||||
\notes.
|
\joinSplitDescriptions to be distinguishable.
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
As stated in \crossref{joinsplitdesc}, either $\vpubOld$ or $\vpubNew$ \MUST be zero.
|
As stated in \crossref{joinsplitdesc}, either $\vpubOld$ or $\vpubNew$ \MUST be zero.
|
||||||
|
@ -4135,6 +4135,7 @@ The errors in the proof of Ledger Indistinguishability mentioned in
|
||||||
\item Clarify the consensus rule preventing double-spends.
|
\item Clarify the consensus rule preventing double-spends.
|
||||||
\item Clarify what a \noteCommitment opens to in \crossref{crprf}.
|
\item Clarify what a \noteCommitment opens to in \crossref{crprf}.
|
||||||
\item Correct the order of arguments to $\Commit{}$ in \crossref{concretecomm}.
|
\item Correct the order of arguments to $\Commit{}$ in \crossref{concretecomm}.
|
||||||
|
\item Correct a statement about indistinguishability of \joinSplitDescriptions.
|
||||||
\end{itemize}
|
\end{itemize}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\introlist
|
\introlist
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue