Stop panicking when fail_with is called twice on a connection
We can't rule out the connection state changing between the state checks and any eventual failures, particularly in the presence of async code. So we turn this panic into a warning.
This commit is contained in:
parent
44c8fafc29
commit
a6c1cd3c35
|
@ -511,8 +511,32 @@ where
|
||||||
.0
|
.0
|
||||||
.lock()
|
.lock()
|
||||||
.expect("mutex should be unpoisoned");
|
.expect("mutex should be unpoisoned");
|
||||||
if guard.is_some() {
|
if let Some(original_error) = guard.clone() {
|
||||||
panic!("called fail_with on already-failed connection state");
|
// A failed connection might experience further errors if we:
|
||||||
|
// 1. concurrently process two different messages
|
||||||
|
// 2. check for a failed state for the second message
|
||||||
|
// 3. fail the connection due to the first message
|
||||||
|
// 4. fail the connection due to the second message
|
||||||
|
//
|
||||||
|
// It's not clear:
|
||||||
|
// * if this is actually a bug,
|
||||||
|
// * how we can modify Zebra to avoid it.
|
||||||
|
//
|
||||||
|
// This warning can also happen due to these bugs:
|
||||||
|
// * we mark a connection as failed without using fail_with
|
||||||
|
// * we call fail_with without checking for a failed connection
|
||||||
|
// state
|
||||||
|
//
|
||||||
|
// See the original bug #1510, the initial fix #1531, and the later
|
||||||
|
// bug #1599.
|
||||||
|
warn!(?original_error,
|
||||||
|
new_error = ?e,
|
||||||
|
connection_state = ?self.state,
|
||||||
|
client_receiver = ?self.client_rx,
|
||||||
|
"calling fail_with on already-failed connection state: ignoring new error");
|
||||||
|
// we don't need to clean up the connection, the original call to
|
||||||
|
// fail_with does that
|
||||||
|
return;
|
||||||
} else {
|
} else {
|
||||||
*guard = Some(e);
|
*guard = Some(e);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue