This lets us distinguish between cases where the message was unsupported
(e.g., BIP11 messages), and cases where the message was uninterpretable
in context (e.g., unsolicited messages).
The original version of this commit ran into
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/64552
again. Thanks to @yaahc for suggesting a workaround (using futures combinators
to avoid writing an async block).
Remove the seed command entirely, and make the behavior it provided
(responding to `Request::Peers`) part of the ordinary functioning of the
start command.
The new `Inbound` service should be expanded to handle all request
types.
> Added a test that the handshake's version message matches specified fields, but the test does not compile, because rustc doesn't believe that the Box<dyn std::error::Error + Send + Sync + 'static> is 'static, and therefore isn't a Box<dyn std::error::Error + Send + Sync + 'static>. This manifests as being unable to spawn the connect_isolated task. From digging through Tokio issues I believe that this is an instance of rust-lang/rust#64552 .
Co-authored-by: Jane Lusby <jlusby42@gmail.com>
The peer set provides an automatically managed connection pool, abstracting
away all the details of handling individual peer connections. However, it's
also useful to be able to create completely isolated and
minimally-distinguishable connections to individual peers, in order to be able
to send specific messages over Tor, or to implement some custom network crawler
logic.
* add test for first checkpoint sync
Prior this this change we've not had any tests that verify our sync /
network logic is well behaved. This PR cleans up the test helper code to
make error reports more consistent and uses this cleaned up API to
implement a checkpoint sync test which runs zebrad until it reads the
first checkpoint event from stdout.
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
* move include out of unix cfg
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
The previous code filled in block height 0 for a missing coinbase height
in `SledState::commit_finalized`, since the genesis block is the only
block without a coinbase height (because of a mistake when it was
created).
However, @teor2345 noticed that this is incorrect, because we already
parse the genesis block specially and fill in its coinbase height
correctly. So instead, we can .expect it to be present, because we can
assume that all finalized blocks are valid.
This makes the component verifiers both always return `poll_ready`,
because they do not exert backpressure and cannot fail.
The checkpoint verifier now immediately rejects any blocks that arrive
after it finishes checkpointing, instead of marking the service itself
as failed.
The chain verifier is agnostic to the readiness behavior of its
components, and reports readiness when they are both ready.
This is a really nice function but there might be a bug in its future
implementation: https://github.com/tower-rs/tower/issues/469
This bug may have already been fixed for the 0.4.0 release, so we could change
back then.
This test aimed to exercise both the checkpoint and block verifiers by
making a checkpoint list of length 1. However, the block verifier can't
work on any blocks below Sapling activation.
Instead of conditionally parsing the hardcoded checkpoint list and
optionally making a CheckpointVerifier, make one unconditionally, and
use the config settings to decide whether to route responses to it.
Then, fix up all of the places needed to make it compile and remove all
of the dead code.
This disables one test that can't be easily fixed at the moment, because
it tests the wrong thing: the checkpoint and block verifiers will
produce different transcripts.
It also disables the initial_tip logic for now, pending simplification
of the ChainVerifier logic.
Henry de Valence
Alfredo Garcia
Jane Lusby
noone
teor
dependabot[bot]